Search results for "Scale Individual participant data"

showing 1 items of 1 documents

Depression prevalence using the HADS-D compared to SCID major depression classification: An individual participant data meta-analysis.

2020

Objectives Validated diagnostic interviews are required to classify depression status and estimate prevalence of disorder, but screening tools are often used instead. We used individual participant data meta-analysis to compare prevalence based on standard Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – depression subscale (HADS-D) cutoffs of ≥8 and ≥11 versus Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID) major depression and determined if an alternative HADS-D cutoff could more accurately estimate prevalence. Methods We searched Medline, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations via Ovid, PsycINFO, and Web of Science (inception-July 11, 2016) for studies comparing HADS-D scores to SCID major…

AdultMalemedicine.medical_specialtyMEDLINEDiagnostic interviewScale Individual participant dataHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingHospital Anxiety and DepressionInternal medicinePrevalenceMedicineHumansScreening tool030212 general & internal medicineDepression (differential diagnoses)Screening toolsAgedDepressive Disorder Majorbusiness.industryDepressionIndividual participant dataIndividual participant dataMiddle AgedConfidence interval3. Good healthPsychiatry and Mental healthClinical PsychologyHospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleMeta-analysisMeta-analysis/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_beingFemalebusiness030217 neurology & neurosurgeryJournal of psychosomatic research
researchProduct